Search for: "MATTER OF F M JR"
Results 81 - 100
of 407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
VAN NEST - # 84065 [email] CHRISTA M. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Henderson, Jr. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Connors, County Attorney, Lyons (Erin M. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Connors, County Attorney, Lyons (Erin M. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 7:55 am
" North Carolina attorney Henderson Hill told Judge Hilton M. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
"I'm a loose cannon. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:18 am
José Farias Jr. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:31 am
Kevin M. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 7:19 am
Council President Edward F. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 12:59 pm
I’m sorry if this seems nitpicky. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Tilton, 465 F. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Edwards; Charles M. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Freed, 37 F.4th 1199, 1203-04 (2022). [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 9:59 am
James Pearison, Jr. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Charged are Joseph Vito Mastronardo, Jr. and John Mastronardo, the two alleged leaders; Joseph F. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Charged are Joseph Vito Mastronardo, Jr. and John Mastronardo, the two alleged leaders; Joseph F. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 12:34 pm
Kennedy, Jr. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
[Click court of appeals case numbers to retrieve opinion of the court below]Petitions Denied June 27, 200807-0437 CONSTABLE JACK F. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant reviews this report and determines, by a majority vote, whether to "return the matter to the staff for further investigation or accept or reject the staff recommendation" (Executive Law § 94 [10] [f]).If defendant determines that there is credible evidence of a violation of relevant law, the subject of the investigation must be provided a due process hearing before an independent arbitrator (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [h]-[i]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Defendant reviews this report and determines, by a majority vote, whether to "return the matter to the staff for further investigation or accept or reject the staff recommendation" (Executive Law § 94 [10] [f]).If defendant determines that there is credible evidence of a violation of relevant law, the subject of the investigation must be provided a due process hearing before an independent arbitrator (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [h]-[i]). [read post]
