Search for: "MATTER OF J C B"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
The C&J-Nabors transaction initially was proposed by a Citi banker to C&J’s CEO, Joshua Comstock. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm
Two of the then minor children of J, A and C, are petitioners herein. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 6:24 am
” The team described certain GorillaWeld packaging options as “[c]lose to JB Weld brand” and aspiring to “go[ ] directly after [J-B Weld Original],” and the team stated their target market was consumers that had used the J-B Weld Original product in the last six months. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:37 am
., No. 10 C 1203, Slip Op. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b) file a… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:11 am
J.). [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:28 am
Attorney Paul J. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:28 am
., d/b/a C&J Jewelry ("Narragansett") was sued by Slane & Slane Designs LLC ("Slane") in the Southern District of New York for various theories, including breach of contract, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of express and implied warranties. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:43 am
Mar. 26, 2014) (Kocoras, J.). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 4:13 am
., No. 09 C 0003, Slip Op. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Mar. 3, 2011) (Kendall, J.). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
The court then noted that the taxpayer’s narrow focus on this aspect of exhibit J gave no effect to the cross-references in Exhibits B and J. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
The examining division equated the term "embodiment" with subject-matter that has to fall "within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims", and concluded that the description so adapted was not in conformity with the independent claims, contrary to Rule 42(1)(c) EPC, because the term "embodiment" was used in parts of the description that describe subject-matter that was not part of the subject-matter of these… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
., April 8, 2011, Nealon, J.)(32 pages), Judge Terrence R. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:43 pm
Although Birss J did not refer to recent decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on the right of communication/making available to the public, he appeared to dismiss implicitly the approach taken in Svensson [Katposts here] and its progeny, ie BestWater [here] and C More Entertainment [here and here]. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 3:41 am
Aug. 7, 2018) (Dow, J.). [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
The first prong narrows to three specific types of abstract ideas: (a) mathematical concepts; (b) certain methods of organizing human activity; and (c) mental processes. [read post]
