Search for: "MATTER OF J W J C" Results 81 - 100 of 1,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A method of analyzing a DNA sample that contains genetic material from at least two individuals to determine a probability distribution of genotype likelihood or weight in the sample, comprising the steps: (a) amplifying the DNA sample to produce an amplification product comprising DNA fragments, wherein each allele at a locus is amplified to generate relative amounts of DNA fragments of the alleles that are proportional to the relative amounts of template DNA from the alleles in the DNA sample, and… [read post]
4 May 2007, 2:56 am
(May 3, 2007; Bryson, J.), the Federal Circuit cited the Supreme Court decision in KSR v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 1:28 am
, 10 Chapman Law Review 299-358 (2006).Stephen W. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
This was the first case to consider the s.10A(5) Defamation Act 2005 “serious harm” threshold, introduced by the Justice Legislation Amendment (Supporting Victims and Other Matters) Act 2020. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
McDonald (by her litigation friend Duncan J McDonald) v McDonald & Ors, heard 15-16 March 2016. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 1 March, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v S J & J Monk (a firm). [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm by Michael Thomas
Burnyeat J.The defendants applied for an order for double costs pursuant to 9-1(1)(c) and 9-1(5)(b) and 14-1(1) of the Rules following the trial of the matter which commenced on May 31, 2010. [read post]