Search for: "MATTER OF MCFADDEN"
Results 81 - 100
of 138
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in McFadden v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
A previous complaint was dismissed by the police on the basis that the matter was civil and regulatory. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
McFadden, a member of the firm’s Family Law practice, represents clients in a wide variety of domestic relations matters, including custody disputes and divorces. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 3:12 am
Troitskiy, Central Asian Regional Security Complex: The Impact of Russian and US Policies Alexandre Bohas, Transnational Firms and the Knowledge Structure: The Case of the Walt Disney Company Laurence Cooley & Jasmin Mujanović, Changing the Rules of the Game: Comparing FIFA/UEFA and EU Attempts to Promote Reform of Power-Sharing Institutions in Bosnia-Herzegovina Special Section: Corporeal Capitalism—Body Matters in International Political EconomyNicola Smith & Donna… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am
After thinking about the matter a little bit during the first go-round, the Court called for the views of the Solicitor General, who recently recommended the Court deny cert. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
McFadden v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 1:37 am
This is the McFadden Tartan, registered underthe Scottish Register of Tartans Act 2008 This blogger has just realised that one of the copyright references to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling has slipped through the 1709 Blog's net: it's Case C-484/14 McFadden, a reference from the Landgericht München I (Germany). [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Case C-484/14 McFadden is a reference for a preliminary ruling from CJEU-loving Member State Germany, seeking clarification as regards the liability of a freely-accessible wi-fi provider for third-party copyright infringements committed via that wireless network. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:52 am
” No matter what choice O’Connor made, there would be repercussions. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:55 am
The criminal matter is a serious one and could result in not only fines, but also incarceration. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
People v McFadden Court Discusses Conviction Against the Weight of the Evidence. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
The trial judge responded to the petition noting that “[i]n guardianship matters, there is no one protecting the ward against possible abuses [by the guardian], except the court. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Class action plaintiffs are not entitled to conduct discovery as a matter of right if there are strong indications that no amount of discovery will enable them to substantiate their class allegations. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 8:05 am
That may have been enough, Judge McFadden said, to tip the scales in favor of Emory Clinic. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:28 pm
By Christopher DeGroff and Robb McFadden Fresh on the heels of a full defense verdict in one of the EEOC’s highest profile sexual harassment cases of 2012-2013, the Commission was dealt another blow on April 19, 2013, when the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 12:53 pm
That is a practical matter, because the chains of command are shorter. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
McFadden, 179 A.D.2d 1003, 1004, 579 N.Y.S.2d 273, 274 (1992)2. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
In the end, the court easily concluded that merely providing a positive introduction and link did not make NBCUniversal an information content provider with respect to Buhl's content: In the present matter, NBCUniversal included an introduction to and hyperlink to Buhl's allegedly defamatory statements. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Foley Hoag attorneys Michael Keating, David Kluft and Daniel McFadden represented the prevailing judge in this matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
It is well settled that a post-trial motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 cannot preserve a contention for review that is raised for the first time in the motion (see People v McFadden, 94 AD3d 1150, 1150; People v Jones, 85 AD3d 1667, 1668), but as noted that is not what occurred here inasmuch as defendant made an objection before jury selection. [read post]
