Search for: "MATTER OF N C F"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
., 74 F.4th 1360 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
Consideration should be given to, among other things: “(a) asset management; (b) access controls; (c) encryption; (d) communications security; (e) physical and environmental security; [and] (f) operations security. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
[Nosotros estamos, acá, para decirles que los experimentos colectivistas nunca son la solución a los problemas, que aquejan a los ciudadanos del mundo, sino que – por el contrario – son su causa.] [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
See also Matter of H-R-, 7 I & N Dec. 651 (R.C. 1958)). [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
See also Matter of H-R- , 7 I & N Dec. 651 (R.C. 1958)). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 2:19 pm
Trump instead spoke on matters outside the scope of the legal issues before the court. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Apr. 28, 2020) ("[C]laims involving sexual orientation … are examples of matters that qualify as being highly sensitive and of a personal nature. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Indeed, there are key differences between the ISP and social media markets that matter for the First Amendment analysis. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Ct. 2023), § 94.06 n. 36.2]. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:03 am
Duncan, 333 F. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:03 pm
Duncan, 333 F. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
School Dist., 112 F. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
Comm’n, 713 F.2d 918, 926 (2d Cir. 1983). [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:34 am
” 312 F.3d 1368, 1376–77 (Fed. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
Comm'n, 531 F.3d 868, 873 (D.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
[I]n Roer v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
This fact makes Section 2(c) different than the viewpoint-discriminatory provisions in Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act at issue in Tam and Brunetti that banned registration of subject matter that may be disparaging, immoral, or scandalous. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) (No. 92-102) (“peer review referees and editors limit their assessment of submitted articles to such matters as style, plausibility, and defensibility; they do not duplicate experiments from scratch or plow through reams of computer-generated data in order to guarantee accuracy or veracity or certainty”), with Brief for Amici Curiae New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Annals of Internal Medicine in Support of… [read post]
