Search for: "MATTER OF PETERS"
Results 81 - 100
of 6,723
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2015, 8:47 am
Peters’ essay valuably rejected the binary that appears in far too many versions of law and literature scholarship. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
Peter Gleick in his blog City Lights which I highly recommend. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:50 pm
Peter the Great spent the majority of his years in power at war with his neighbors. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:29 am
And the opinion fit nicely with Peter Lee's thesis about Supreme Court patent cases raising cognitive burdens for judges. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 1:10 pm
RALPH PETERS ON JOHN WARNER: Peters, writing from Fallujah, isn't impressed: Although this trend has been reported, our battlefield leaders here agree that the magnitude of the shift hasn't registered back home: Al Qaeda is on the verge of a humiliating, devastating strategic defeat - rejected by their fellow Sunni Muslims. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:17 pm
Any questions regarding this action, or similar issues, can be directed to Peter Moulinos at peter@moulinos.com.A Supreme Court judge in Suffolk County has decided that Bank of America should be penalized for its abusive tactics against a homeowner whose property was in foreclosure by reducing in half the amount owed by the homeowner to Bank of America.Judge Arlen Spinner, who as previously issued harsh and newsworthy decisions against banks in foreclosure cases, ruled in Bank of… [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:00 pm
Procedural History: Peter Paul Biro, Plaintiff v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:30 pm
Further to discussions of the Verfaillie matter, note that one of the writers following this story is Eugenie Reich, who has separately written about the Purdue "bubble fusion" matter.From Reich's article (with Peter Aldhous):Now New Scientist has examined a US patent (number 7015037) granted in 2006 that covers the isolation and use of MAPCs. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 8:02 pm
“Book publishing is a business and increasingly a technical one, but at its heart it is an art, writes Peter J. [read post]
28 May 2016, 2:16 pm
And the fact that the agenda is personal rather than ideological should not matter. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:21 pm
As a general matter, courts will only consider the constitutionality of a given law or state action if the case cannot be decided on any other ground. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm
Not only is this a breach of the legislative provisions, but it also more fundamentally deprives the open reporting of matters before our courts. [read post]
28 May 2011, 6:34 am
Peters. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
You just finished reading Save the Date: “Copyright Matters” Public Events! [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
Peter Margulies writes in with an excellent summary of what sounds like a fascinating conference Friday at Boston University: BU’s conf. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:49 pm
Via Peter Daou and Media Matters, the Washington Post brings it: Lighten up! [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 2:34 pm
Check out this insight by NMC on a fact revealed in Judge Weill's order: December 11, 2007: Vic Leo’s desk phone notes report Eaton was investigating “after the publication of media reports” about the subpoena issued to Langston Law Firm “seeking documents reflecting payments made to Ed Peters regarding a matter before Judge DeLaughter. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Brokers must publicly disclose reportable events on their CRD customer complaints, IRS tax liens, judgments, investigations, and even criminal matters. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
You had a recent post on LinkedIn that offered a critical analysis of the European Data Protection Board’s (EDPB) August 2024 consent-or-pay opinion, highlighting concerns about its effects on the freedom to conduct business. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:39 am
In his judgment, the hearing officer cited the judgments of Pumfrey J in Shopalotto ([2005] EWHC2416 (Pat)) and Peter Prescott QC in IGT([2005] EWHC 568 (Pat)) where, in the latter case, Mr Prescott held that “on matters of searching I do not want to say one word that would fetter the discretion of the Patent Office in this and future cases”. [read post]
