Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 81 - 100
of 21,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
Most recently, in Murphy v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 7:23 pm
The 126-page opinion in the matter of Basho Technologies Holdco B, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:08 am
Div., A-5951-08T1, November 30, 2010: “[T]he trial court’s subject matter jurisdiction in a matrimonial action does not normally encompass the power to adjudicate financial disputes that may crop up between a litigant and the litigant’s attorney. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:47 pm
By Jason Rantanen Power Integrations, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 pm
Matter of City Council of City of Mount Vernon v Batra, 2011 NY Slip Op 02664, Appellate Division, Second Department Ravi Batra, former counsel to the Office of the Mayor of the City of Mount Vernon, contended that he was... [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:37 pm
Because the "effective" clause in the bond condition of the 2009 Certification did not operate to block or delay the federal licensing proceeding, and it did not contravene Section 401(a)(1)'s waiver provision, much less the Commission's regulations, Alcoa Power's objections to the substantive content of the 2009 Certification is a matter of State law that is properly raised in the State proceeding, as Alcoa Power has done. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Defenders of local power will need to invoke NFIB v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:28 am
Supreme Court case law after Baker fails to resolve the matter. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am
Patchak v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am
Finally, I'll also explain why the article's new account of the original understanding of the Necessary and Proper Clause can serve as a useful framework for addressing some of the issues presented in Bond v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
That's why cases like South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 2:01 am
In other words, as a constitutional matter, can Congress, when legislating under its war powers, limit the normal sovereign immunity that state governments enjoy? [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
(aka The Chinese Exclusion Case), which announced that immigration control was “an incident of sovereignty” and thus a matter for Congressional—not state or judicial—power. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
In Missouri v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:55 am
After all, Chevron v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
In a 1991 case, Freytag v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:30 am
As I noted in the Verdict column, United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:39 am
Supreme Court recognized Congress's "broad power" to act in matters concerning posts more than a century ago. [read post]
