Search for: "MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. King"
Results 81 - 100
of 248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
The decision in Krigsman v Goldberg 2018 NY Slip Op 30104(U) January 19, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 151271 /16 Judge: Manuel J. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am
Prior Bankruptcy Narrows Plaintiff’s Standing to Enforce Rights as Member of Several LLCs Garcia v Garcia, 2016 NY Slip Op 32780(U) [Sup Ct Kings County July 13, 2016]. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to various… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:24 am
I’m nonetheless having difficulty giving the benefit of the doubt to most of what happened in Verkhoglyad v Benimovich, 2017 NY Slip Op 51133(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 12, 2017], a case recently decided by the Brooklyn Supreme Court in which it denied enforcement of a mandatory forum selection clause, disregarded the operating agreement’s New Jersey choice-of-law provision by applying New York law to various… [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 4:24 am
, 2017 NY Slip Op 31790(U), August 25, 2017, Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 295/2015-E, Judge: Debra Silber. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine dispute regarding any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:20 am
LEXIS 1468, 2016 NY Slip Op 30727(U), *10 [NY County 2016]). [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm
Thomas, 51 Misc 3d 341 (Crim Ct, Kings County 2016); People v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Rennert v S.M.R. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:15 am
In Matter of Brooke S.B. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:52 pm
See US Bank National Association, v Flatbush Extension LLC, et al., Index No. 26434/09. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am
And in the case raised by Andrew, Welch v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
As held in the case of Scarpuzza v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:45 am
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
Claimants who allege to be distributees of the decedent have the burden of proof on each of these elements (Matter of Cruz, NYLJ, Jan. 7, 2002, at 29, col 4 [Sur Ct, Kings County]; Matter of Balacich, NYLJ, Jan. 24, 1997 at 30, col 2 [Sur Ct, Kings County]). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:58 am
Douglas, prepared the famous case, Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:23 pm
Concisely stated, it is the contract, and not the will, which is irrevocable (see, 38 NY Jur 2d, Decedents' Estates, § 324; see also, Glass v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Contests over evocation of identity; expansion by states in Ala., S.D.; pending NY law for postmortem rights. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:33 pm
Concisely stated, it is the contract, and not the will, which is irrevocable (see, 38 NY Jur 2d, Decedents' Estates, § 324; see also, Glass v. [read post]
