Search for: "MATTER OF T H" Results 81 - 100 of 6,261
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am by Russell Knight
…[H]arassment occurs when a protagonist knowingly causes his victim to suffer undue distress. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (I:62) For his fourth and final appointment, Harding nominated district judge Edward T. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
  Our Court of Appeals has held that separate misappropriations from the same victim over time do not constitute a single offense as a matter of law, but there is nothing to preclude a single indictment with the date of offense extending over time and including multiple conversions. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
I say “procedures” because states don’t even have to have popular elections to select electors. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am by Russell Knight
“[T]he circumstances and reasons for the intended relocation” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(1), is certainly a good and noble circumstance and reason…true love. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am by Josh Blackman
"But the Anderson litigants claim that they are encompassed within the meaning of the phrase 'office under the United States.'" As a matter of advocacy, lawyers should always be willing to acknowledge, if pressed, weaknesses in a position. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:40 am by Jon Hyman
It doesn't matter what the judges say tomorrow night, Norah has already won. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm by Tobin Admin
§ 9-11-56(h) into motion, yet commits a procedural default fatal to his appeal, is foreclosed from thereafter resubmitting the matter for review on appeal of the final judgment. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
However, the DoD Manual stops short of embracing any of these possibilities as a matter of binding law, and instead opts for a more pragmatic, discretionary approach. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[24]  The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]