Search for: "MENDOZA v. UNITED STATES"
Results 81 - 100
of 195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2014, 5:29 am
United States, 468 U.S. 559, 563 (1984). [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 12:48 pm
Mendoza at the United States/Mexico border in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, the case was before the district court on Ms. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 7:49 pm
Fulton County School District 13-307 Issue: Whether, when a plaintiff in federal court seeks to invoke nonmutual offensive collateral estoppel against a state or local government based on a prior state adjudication, the availability of collateral estoppel is governed by state or federal law; (2) whether, if federal law controls, United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:02 pm
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
James-Frederick v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:28 am
Tavera's motion for a new trial based on the Brady failure was still pending when the Sixth Circuit decided, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:59 am
Justia has this summary: Mendoza drove a truck from North Carolina to Tennessee with Tavera as a passenger. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 3:30 pm
Washburn student intern Amy Ahrens and I won in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
” Further, there is no legitimate expectation of privacy in an open field, so camera surveillance would be allowed under the privacy standards established by Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57; Tot v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
A lengthy explanation of reasonable suspicion and suspected forged paper tags is United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
The cases on asylum seekers referred to above rely on the right to dignity as a way of channelling social and economic rights through the grid of the ECHR and dignity is of course an oft-cited interest in litigation involving discrimination against homosexuals (see Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
