Search for: "MILLER v FOX"
Results 81 - 100
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
In Miller v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm
Ebola: Individual’s Freedoms v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 7:03 pm
” Additionally, Levine relies heavily on United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:14 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
P. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Mantich 13-1348Issue: Whether Miller v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Raven v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 9:45 am
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
Rejecting generalizations, this book offers case studies that pair cultural histories with close readings of both contested texts and trial transcripts to reveal the ways in which specific engagements with obscenity mattered to particular American Jews at discrete historical moments.Reading American culture from Theodore Dreiser and Henry Miller to Curb Your Enthusiasm and FCC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Fox v Boulter, 5 December 2013 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Entm’t 2000, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:33 pm
In Fried v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm
The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Finally: Mondaq has a very nice summary of the Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in Avalon Legal Information Svcs. v. [read post]
