Search for: "MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP." Results 81 - 100 of 102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2015, 1:26 pm by Beth Graham
Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 U.S. 20, 26 (1991) (quoting Mitsubishi Motors Corp., supra at 628. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
The Supreme Court also stated that it has repeatedly recognized contractually required arbitration of claims as andldquo;satisfying the statutory prescription of civil liability in court,andrdquo; citing Shearson/American Express again, as well as the 1985 case Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Notwithstanding Concepción, the Supreme Court previously acknowledged that ‘not ... all controversies implicating statutory rights are suitable for arbitration’” (citing Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The majority seemed to doubt whether there is any such thing as the "effective vindication" theory in the first place, describing its genesis as "dictum in Mitsubishi Motors." [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:31 am
If we were in New York this coming week, we sure know one place we would visit.LEVEL 1Booth Company1526 BMW of North America1300 CBS 101.11305 Chevrolet1432 City Cycles1536 Coates Int'l1501 Dodge1420 Dub Publishing1234 Empire Executive Services1434/1436 Explorer Van Company1405 Ford Motor Company1200 Fresh 102.71305 General Motors1315 GMC1530 Grand Am Recreational Vehicles Inc.1425 Honda1600 Hot 971400 HQ Custom Design1428 … [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:43 am by Katherine Stone
One telling omission from Gorsuch’s opinion is his failure, despite recounting a mountain of precedent, to mention a fundamental pillar of arbitration law that was articulated by Justice Harry Blackmun in Mitsubishi Motors v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:56 pm
Honda Motor Co., Inc., No. 06-CV-02433, Dkt. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 11:14 am by Diane Marie Amann
Livingston (1964), and further declined to privilege what the Court in Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Court finds that former law student's claims for a determination that certain of her debts were discharged by operation of law because they are not student loans excluded from discharge under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(8), and that the Defendants violated the Discharge Order, are core matters. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Last week the New Jersey Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision (6-0) ordered a nationwide third-party payer class action decertified. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central nervous system stem cell and… [read post]