Search for: "MORALES VS. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2007, 1:38 am by Sean Hayes
Article 21(4) of the Korean Constitution states that “Neither speech nor the press shall violate the honor or rights of other persons nor undermine public morals or social ethics. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:39 pm by R.J. MacReady
Both Abdul-Kabir and (especially Brewer expressly state that Supreme Court precedent has long rejected the notion that a jury can meaningfully express its reasoned moral response to evidence of a troubled or disruptive childhood within the narrow confines of the special issues. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the symposium on Andrew Koppelman, Gay Rights vs Religious Liberty? [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
X was in fact overruled, sub silentio, by the case of Y vs. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:31 am by charley foster
"The court ultimately held that the claims (1) were foreclosed under the Supreme Court's summary dismissal for lack of a substantial federal question a Minnesota Supreme Court decision upholding that state's statute defining marriage as between opposite sex persons, and (2) in the alternative, failed on the merits.Hawaii Decision Jackson vs Abercromnie [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:53 pm
Judicial Abstention from Contested Moral/Empirical Debates: Courts are supposed to make judgments based primarily on legal principle (or on constitutional text), and second-guessing legislative judgment under broad concepts such as “liberty” involves courts having to make subjective and unprincipled judgments about contested empirical matters and contested moral matters. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by Benjamin Wittes
It’s not just the special counsel investigating him, his staff, the attorney general, and the deputy attorney general with whom the President of the United States has a beef. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 1:52 am by SOIssues
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
Nevertheless, it's important to note that state intervention in the economy differs by sectors, and that intervention comes in many forms.Political vs. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
One can say that a government has a duty to its own people over those not within its constituency, and therefore one cannot expect any government to ignore the immediate welfare and morale of its people. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:24 am by Liron Libman
A valid concern might be that a relative will use the applicant against state security in ways unknown even to the applicant. [read post]
25 May 2024, 10:39 am by Russell Knight
“A judgment of dissolution or of legal separation or of declaration of invalidity of marriage may be enforced…by order of court pursuant to petition…Any judgment entered within this State may be enforced…in the judicial circuit wherein such judgment was entered or last modified by the filing of a petition with notice mailed to the respondent at his last known address, or by the issuance of summons to the respondent. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 10:27 am by Mark Bennett
Anyone believe, for moral or religious reasons, that they can’t sit in judgment? [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:35 am by Adam Wagner
The state now has a law against funeral picketing, but did not at that time. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:19 pm by Brian Pascal
One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:15 pm
"Just as in Lawrence," wrote Reavley, "the State here wants to use its laws to enforce a public moral code by restricting private intimate conduct. [read post]