Search for: "MORRIS v. MAINE, STATE OF" Results 81 - 100 of 164
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am by David Hart QC
36, At the hearing of the main appeal, I referred to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-62/00 Marks & Spencer v IRC. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am by Marie Louise
(IIPRD Blog) Reflecting on the transparency crusade (Spicy IP)   Indonesia IP law changes – consolidation of 3 main laws into a Copyrights Law and Industrial Property law (covering patents, trademarks and industrial designs) (IP Komodo)   Israel Israel Supreme Court reverses Eve – Eva trademark decision: Philip Morris Products S.A. vs. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am by John Hopkins
Justice Fahey also apparently analyzed the findings of other courts who have heard evidence against the tobacco industry, including findings in the Engle case here in Florida and the US v Philip Morris case. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm by Scott Dodson
  In Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 12:06 am by John Mikhail
Fisher (1805), then in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
”The main issue was accordingly whether it was obvious to try the techniques described in the talk. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
 The Court also denied cert. without comment in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That is the case of Philip Morris USA, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
In 2003, the plaintiff in this case, Loretta Lawson, brought an action in a Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas alleging that the defendants, Philip Morris Companies, Inc. and Philip Morris Incorporated, misrepresented the health risks of light cigarettes stating that they were less harmful than regular cigarettes in violation of various laws of different states. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
And I mean "hackers" in the nicest possible sense of the term "hackers" – they were people who played with tools, not people who broke things or even, in the main, broke into things. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
SG and 35 state AGs have weighed in claiming that data mining does not merit First Amendment protection. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am by admin
Main Street, Box C Hillsboro, Illinois 62049-0210 Phone: 217/532-9546 Fax: 217/532-9614 Morgan Theresa Lonergan 300 West State St. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
British American Tobacco defeats trade mark challenge in the Commonwealth Caribbean: Philip Morris Products S.A. v British American Tobacco (Brands) Limited (jiplp) Brazil Can we feed the hungry on statistics? [read post]