Search for: "MOTION TO ALLOW FILING OF NOTICE OF RELATED DOCKET"
Results 81 - 100
of 262
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Docket: 15-13552 Opinion Date: October 18, 2016 Areas of Law: Constitutional Law, Native American Law Plaintiff filed suit against the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, alleging that she was terminated from her job because of her age pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. 621-634. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
05-17-00849-CV, 2018 WL 2126936 (Tex.App.- Dallas, May 7, 2018, pet. filed and docketed under No. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
Defendant has met the public notice requirement by filing a separate Notice of the Motion to Seal for docketing. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
It’s been left to the discretion of the trial court to ascertain whether plaintiffs should be allowed additional time to file motions addressing discovery violations. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 5:53 am
A summary hearing is similar except with the formality of the judge only considering filed pleadings and filed affidavits. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:29 am
He filed a motion with the judge, requesting that the new information not be allowed at trial because it was past the deadline. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:26 am
Comm’r of Revenue, Docket No. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:46 pm
A hearing on the motion must be held at least twenty-one days after such a motion is filed, but the court must rule on the motion within forty-five days of its filing. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Shinseki Docket: 09-1036 Issue: Whether the time limit in 38 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:15 pm
Jurisdiction -- Prohibition -- Torts -- Automobile accident -- Third-party complaint against liability insurance carrier -- Trial court lacked jurisdiction over third-party bad-faith complaint against defendant's liability insurer, which was labeled by plaintiff as a crossclaim, where pleading was filed after trial court had entered final judgment in tort case and after time for filing motions for rehearing or new trial had passed -- Order denying… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
There has been no 13(b)-related post-AMG action on this docket. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:47 am
P. 3(d)(1) states that the clerk of the district court "must promptly send a copy of the notice of appeal and of the docket entries .,. to the clerk of the court of appeals named in the notice." [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 6:32 pm
Motion To Compel Discovery In An Illinois Divorce Case After the 201(k) conference has happened and discovery is still not complied with, the discovery requester may file a motion to compel discovery. [read post]
19 May 2021, 6:45 am
Securities Docket hosted the panel as part of its 2021 Securities Enforcement Forum West.Recent SEC crypto cases. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Supp.2d at 1357 (docket numbers reflecting 2011 filing dates). [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
The first warrant didn’t allow the second search, and the nonresponsive files were still protected by the Fourth Amendment after the first warrant had been executed. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 4:50 am
Then motions got filed and then all of a sudden it’s 2016 and M.S. was required to file a motion about the timeliness issue. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:19 pm
Cathrall, IV, decided March 18, 2009, Docket Number A-4085-06T3. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:46 am
Burroughs noted that the government’s reversal moots the matter, but she is keeping it on her docket pending further motions from the parties. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 12:47 pm
See Notice of Supplemental Authority, Case No. 16-341-JFB-SRF, D.I. 76 (Sept. 18, 2017). [read post]
