Search for: "MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO." Results 81 - 100 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
  Drageris the first appellate court post-Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
This post is not from the Dechert side of the blog, because of that firm's involvement in this matter.We mentioned, in the “here’s what’s out there” portion of our 2013 Top Ten post that “The long-pending Lance case (2010 #-6) remains undecided by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, some three years after oral argument. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
We wrote almost exclusively about the defense of pharmaceutical and medical device product liability cases. . . . [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), and Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Reg. 37636, 37637 (FDA July 22, 1977).Now, the FDA has done a screeching four-wheel drift 180 and proposes to modify its regulations explicitly for the purpose of changing the scope of civil tort liability – in order to eliminate preemption of generic product liability warning (but not design) claims recognized by the Supreme Court under Hatch/Waxman in Mensing and recently reaffirmed in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
  We think that the opinion resembles the First Circuit’s decision in Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Mutual Pharmaceutical, 169 F.R.D. 68 (E.D.Pa. 1996), and Neumerski v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Mutual Pharmaceutical, 169 F.R.D. 68 (E.D.Pa. 1996), and Neumerski v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 1:36 pm by Eric Alexander
                We sometimes take an impish delight in the comments we get from readers who are surprised that we tout defense wins, question the logic of decisions that allow plaintiffs to get past summary judgment with questionable evidence, or—gasp—use sarcasm in how we discuss cases. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Noohi 13-55Issue: Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a state-law rule invalidating arbitration provisions, but not contracts more generally, that lack mutuality of obligation. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm by Bexis
  It appears from the opinion, id., that the defendant tried to extend Mensing/Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]