Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2014, 12:32 pm
Lisa’s listof non-faculty presenters at IPSC prompted me to check out a nifty new paper by Mark Lemley and Shawn Miller, demonstrating that the Federal Circuit reverses claim constructions far less frequently when the district judge below previously sat by designation in a claim construction appeal. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 1:08 pm
By Jason Rantanen In 1998, John Allison and Mark Lemley published a groundbreaking empirical study of patent litigation, Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 3:01 pm
Guest post by Professors Mark A. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Consumers are more likely to find trademarks located in those spaces, and they are probably more likely to perceive features as trademarks if they are in those locations.In their fascinating new article, Trademark Spaces and Trademark Law’s Secret Step Zero, Mark Lemley and Mark McKenna draw out the relevance of physical space for trademark protection, and in particular for non-verbal marks like logos and trade dress. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 5:41 pm
Mark Lemley is the William H. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:32 am
First Amendment Neglect in Supreme Court Intellectual Property Cases Mark A. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
Below are excerpts taken from the Summary of the Argument and the introduction to the Argument in the amicus filing by Mark Lemley and other professors. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:44 pm
They are: Risa Goluboff (Dean at UVA) and Mark Lemley (Stanford). [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 3:45 am
Allison and Mark A. [read post]
10 May 2021, 7:21 am
Here, Stanford Law Professor Mark Lemley, a technology law expert, discusses the case and its wider implications. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:54 am
But then, you knew that anyway. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 7:49 am
Law professors Mark Lemley, Mark McKenna, and Christopher Sprigman are among the lawyers representing plaintiffs in the latest legal action against the lawless Trump. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
Further to the In re Omeprazole case on inherent anticipation, the 271patent blog discussed the article by Burk and Lemley on inherency:For an excellent paper on inherency, see Dan Burk and Mark Lemley's article, coincidentally titled, "Inherency," published in 2005: Inherency is also perhaps the most elusive doctrine in all of patent law. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 1:42 am
Mark Lemley Irrelevant Confusion True story: in 2006 World Cup, several hundred fans of Dutch showed up wearing pants in the colors of the Dutch national team, promotion from beer company. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:55 pm
"The biggest problem with the Bilski decision, said Stanford University law professor Mark A. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
On April 1, IPBiz mentioned text of Mark Lemley from this piece:"It's rare that you've got a major breakthrough that wasn't developed by multiple people at about the same time," said Mark Lemley, professor of intellectual property at Stanford Law School.Separately, Lemley was also quoted about the telephone:"It's not that we wouldn't have had the telephone. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Mark Lemley's discussion of the case and its broader implications is a good place to start if you haven't been following. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:11 pm
Jack Balkin (Yale), Daphne Keller (Stanford), and Mark Lemley (Stanford), moderated by Jane Bambauer (Arizona).] [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:48 pm
Evidence from the Most Litigated Patents by Allison, Lemley, and Walker, one has a reference to Mark A. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:05 am
Christopher Anthony Cotropia and Mark A. [read post]