Search for: "Mark Neuberger" Results 81 - 100 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Llewellyn, Fenwick & West LLP, on Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy season, Say on pay SEC Adopts Amendments to Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules Posted by Eric Orsic, Thomas Conaghan, and Heidi Steele, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Beneficial Ownership, Exchange Act, SEC, Sections 13 Remarks by Commissioner Uyeda at the Practicing Law Institute’s 55th Annual Institute on Securities… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Llewellyn, Fenwick & West LLP, on Tuesday, November 7, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy season, Say on pay SEC Adopts Amendments to Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules Posted by Eric Orsic, Thomas Conaghan, and Heidi Steele, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, on Wednesday, November 8, 2023 Tags: Beneficial Ownership, Exchange Act, SEC, Sections 13 Remarks by Commissioner Uyeda at the Practicing Law Institute’s 55th Annual Institute on Securities… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am by INFORRM
Privacy was the topic of the first few months of 2011 – ending with the report of Lord Neuberger’s Committee on Super-Injunctions – “Super-Injunctions, Anonymised Injunctions and Open Justice” (discussed in a post at the time) and then the extraordinary period of “May Madness“. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:13 am by Charon QC
That is why, from a decade marked by its greedy bankers, venal politicians, compromised spymasters and failed generals, Lord Bingham will be remembered as the most admirable and virtuous figure of his time. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 12:30 am by Hayleigh Bosher
It was guided by the International Advisory Board, chaired by Lord Neuberger (former President of the UK Supreme Court) and comprising eminent international and Ukrainian IP judges and practitioners. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:19 am
[To make out an offence under s.92 Trade Marks Act 1994, the use of the trademark in question must be as an indication of trade origin. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am by Rosalind English
In respect of vicarious liability Lord Neuberger MR described the position as follows; In this case, the Judge accepted, in paragraph 100, that youth work was part of Father Clonan’s employment as a priest, and that his position as a priest “gave him the opportunity to abuse the claimant”. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:31 pm
Evidencing the furious pace of negotiations is the fact that the executed draft of the Asset Purchase Agreement attached to the sale motion is a marked-up "confidential" draft that was re-marked as the "Execution Copy. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
Recent judgments of the UK Supreme Court (‘the UKSC’), in particular, have marked an increasing turn inward, as the ‘Continental’ is abandoned for the ‘Insular’, and the primacy of national constitutional fundamentals are re-emphasised over the provisions of international treaties. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
We’ll focus on Lord Neuberger’s judgment as the others, to be honest, are largely commentary on it.1. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
We’ll focus on Lord Neuberger’s judgment as the others, to be honest, are largely commentary on it.1. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:51 am by INFORRM
A (By his Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) ([2010] 3 All ER 32) a differently constituted Court of Appeal (Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Sir Mark Potter P) took this a stage further. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Lord Neuberger also suggested that developing the law on duties and responsibilities of anonymous speech might be preferable to the chilling effect created by the fear of exposure. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
At a press conference marking the launch of the release of the Master of the Rolls’ report, Lord Neuberger said he ‘would not like to say precisely how many’ super injunctions or anonymous injunctions had been granted since 2000. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether a criminal offence can be committed under the Trade Marks Act 1994, s 92(1)(b) or (c) (selling, offering for sale or distribution/possession with a view) where the proprietor of the registered trade mark has given its consent to the application of the sign which is its registered trade mark or has itself applied its own registered trade mark to the goods, but has not given its consent to the sale, distribution or possession of them. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:53 pm
The Broad Institute argument was supported by a declaration from no less eminent person than Lord Neuberger himself. [read post]