Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 81 - 100
of 12,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 7:47 am
See Textron Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
To mark the occasion, I wanted to share some of the project’s inside story, reflect on its impact and look ahead to what I hope this data will make possible in the future. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
So, if you're going to make a new wine, it might be a good idea to put it in new bottles. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:41 am
MHCS v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
And that’s almost certainly a good thing. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 3:51 am
Nu Science Corporation v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:42 am
Unsophisticated consumers may conflate the purchase of an NFT associated with a digital good with ownership of IP rights in that good. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
For example, in Atari Interactive, Inc., v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am
Pay, Productivity, and Innovation During the Time of the Big Shift Wage patterns have been affected by the big shift because companies may recruit people who can work from home in areas of the country marked by lower wages. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm
This is admittedly a setback for the collective protection of privacy rights, notably similar to the one following the 2021 United Kingdom Supreme Court ruling in Lloyd v Google. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:49 pm
The case (Extreme Durable, I ZR 205/22) focuses on whether the possession of goods abroad constitutes trade mark infringement if the goods are held for the purpose of offering them in the country where the trade mark is protected - in this case, goods stored in Spain and offered for sale on www.amazon.de, which targets German consumers. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
”[2] Wells may have been entitled to his opinion about the quality of the study at issue, and if he had good grounds and a reliable methodology, perhaps he should have been permitted to share that opinion with a jury. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:16 am
Author Mcwesty Licence Public Domain Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertSupreme Court (Lords Hodge, Briggs, Hamblen, Burrows and Kitchin) Lifestyle Equities CV and another v Amazon UK Services Ltd and others [2024] UKSC 8 (6 Mar 2024)The Beverly Hills Polo Club is a popular range of clothing and luxury goods on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
The Advancetrack decision E-Accounting Solutions Ltd (t/a Advancetrack) v Global Infosys Ltd (t/a GI Outsourcing) was a 2023 High Court trade mark infringement dispute (concerning adwords). [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:03 am
Hannah V. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:39 pm
Bakshi v Hosseinzadeh (2017 ONCA 838) marks the seminal case which questions whether property transferred as Mahr, should be excluded pursuant to section 4(2) of the FLA or whether it should be included in the parties’ Net Family Property (NFP) for purposes of the equalization calculation. [read post]
