Search for: "Marks v. Howe"
Results 81 - 100
of 14,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 5:23 am
Exergen Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:27 am
How do you think these cases turned out? [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:03 am
Ilsa, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
Louis marks a pivotal shift in how job transfer discrimination cases under Title VII are approached. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm
Marks v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
Dr Joseph Fesenmair (Bird & Bird, Munich) then gave an explanation of the Court of Justice of the European Union's ruling last year in Case C-487/07 L'Oréal v Bellure. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 2:15 am
Accordingly, a low degree of similarity between those goods or services may be offset by a high degree of similarity between the marks, and vice versa (C-39/97, Canon).In light of all the considerations above and, in particular, the average inherent distinctiveness of the earlier mark, the General Court concluded that there was a likelihood of confusion between the two marks in respect of all goods in Class 11.CommentThis decision is a textbook example (and reminder) of… [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm
How on earth could Global Soap be able to find any mark with ARIEL available in the same Class 3? [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:22 am
Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:37 pm
Just answerin’—and in only two words: Presidential Immunity (see Nixon v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
A mark with low inherent distinctiveness could be found dissimilar at the outset, with its acquired distinctiveness completely discounted, regardless of how compelling it might be. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
The IPKat has received a query from Marc, who wants to know how many countries in the European Union make provision in their domestic law for expedited trade mark applications. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
This would appear to be a strange result (and goes against eg Case T-152/07 Lange Uren v OHIM). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:21 am
Action Ink, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm
Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, Amy Howe explained the argument in Plain English, and Mark Walsh provided a view from the Courtroom. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
In "Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no Strikeout" (here), posted on Friday 6 February. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
For example, in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
For example, in Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
Cipriani v Cipriani [2008] EWHC 3032 (Ch) established the following principles:is the use in accordance with honest practices (inc. a duty to act fairly re the trade mark owner's interests)? [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 11:00 am
Mark Lanier, of Vioxx fame; Mark P. [read post]
