Search for: "Marks v. Smith, et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 11:33 pm
Then Apple brought another motion to dismiss, and a few hours ago filed its reply in support of that motion:Affinity Credit Union et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
Intelligent Products Inc. et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
Circle Design Group, Inc., et al [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Jerry & Linda Smith, et al., a 12-page opinion, Judge Bradford writes:Appellants-Plaintiffs Jerry Pardue and Linda Pardue (collectively, "the Pardues") appeal the trial court's judgment, following a bench trial, in favor of Jerry Smith and Linda Smith (collectively, "the Smiths"), Stephen M. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 1:19 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari in Smith, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Nike, Inc. et al. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
AnchorPoint, Inc., et. al. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
(Article One Partners) Patenting green technology: What you need to know (IPEG) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in case concerning laser inscribing of diamonds a mixed bag: Lazare Kaplan v PhotoScribe (IPBiz) CAFC sides with USPTO in patent re-examination declaration dispute: In re Meyer Manufacturing (Patents Post-Grant) District Court N D Illinois: Scrivener’s error in patent marking does not preclude finding of intent to deceive: Lundeen et al… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Hector Valentine, et al., and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
Quanta Storage America, Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
Quanta Storage America, Inc. et [read post]
