Search for: "Marshall v. York" Results 81 - 100 of 1,201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am by Emma Snell
Marshall Cohen, Sara Murray and Annie Grayer report for CNN. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In relation to the evidence, Arnold LJ found that Neo’s application failed on the first criterion set out in Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although the Court's statement introducing the Marshal's Report describes the Dobbs leak as "a grave assault on the judicial process," the Court's precedents regarding unauthorized disclosure of information suggest a more ambivalent position.In New York Times v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:28 am by Emma Snell
Michael Crowley reports for the New York Times. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under the New York State Constitution, only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to order dissolution of a marriage. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:56 am by Jeff Welty
The New York Times ran this interesting article this week. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Women could vote in New Jersey and free Blacks voted on the same basis as Whites in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, and probably in Connecticut and Maryland was well.[5]  In the fall of 1788, the eleven ratifying states elected Representative and Senators, and voted for the new president. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice John Marshall Harlan II in Poe v. [read post]