Search for: "Martin v. Department of Corrections"
Results 81 - 100
of 274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 3:55 am
So in Colon v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:03 am
” Vance v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
From Admiral Bill McRaven to General Michael Hayden and General Martin Dempsey, some of President Donald Trump’s more visible critics of late have been retired military officers. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:11 pm
Over the week of Nov. 12, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 8:59 am
Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers’ Compensation Board) v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
In this regard, it bears noting that some of the Supreme Court’s most celebrated (and legally correct) decisions (such as Brown v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
While in Martin and Most Lord Walker coined a helpful phrase in saying “relates to” must be more than a “loose or consequential” link, it would be a mistake to elevate that phrase to the status of a test. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:23 am
These departments include the Coast Guard; the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
In General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:14 am
Its arguments strike me as quite correct: Ordering a newspaper to take down the story would violate the First Amendment, even if the conviction had been expunged as a first offense (see, e.g., Martin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
” Bloomberg could well prove correct. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:40 am
Martin testified that he put the cell phone in a plastic bag, taking care not to touch it, and then took it to the Sheriff's Department where he gave it to an investigator. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
The story was judged to be inaccurate by IPSO, and a further correction has been requested. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
COMEY: Correct. [read post]
21 May 2017, 2:42 pm
The issues before the Supreme Court were: (1) Whether Ali v Birmingham City Council [2010] 2 AC 39 should be departed from in the light of Ali v United Kingdom (2016) 63 EHRR 20 and if so to what extent; (2) Whether the reviewing officer should have asked himself whether there was a real risk that the appellant’s mental health would be damaged by moving into the accommodation offered, whether or not her reaction to it was irrational, and if so, whether he did… [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Jacqueline Martin testified that "the amount administered in the Georgia Department of Corrections' Execution Protocol, 5000 mg, is more than sufficient to carry out the execution without causing Plaintiff pain despite the prior administration of 1800 mg of gabapentin per day. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
The Magistrate Judge who has the case began the opinion by explaining that[p]ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3), Martin Preib, a former third-party defendant to this litigation, (hereinafter `Preib’) moves to quash Defendant Paul Ciolino's (hereinafter `Ciolino’) subpoena for phone call recordings made between Preib and the Plaintiff while Plaintiff was incarcerated at the Illinois Department of Corrections (hereinafter `IDOC’)… [read post]
