Search for: "Martin v. Jones" Results 81 - 100 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2007, 10:49 pm
Singletary, 647 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 1994) ............. 9 Jones v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by James Bickford
  At ACSBlog, Martin Magnusson discusses the implications of Thursday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 1:22 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Hoadley, No. 101,205 (July 31, 2009); Shelley Kurt Bock; affirming Judge Martin's suppression order under Fourth AmendmentState v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:54 am by Kali Borkoski
  Judges Merritt and Martin posit that the Court “has now decided that the phrase ‘any other provision of law’ has a meaning exactly opposite to the ordinary meaning of the words” At the National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports on Monday’s decision in Costco v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
Jones has prompted the Bureau to turn off roughly three thousand GPS devices that were previously in use. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
JONES Christopher Martin Jones appeals from his sentence imposed following his conviction for possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on King v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
See also South Hetton Coal Co v North-Eastern News Association [1894] 1 QB 133; Jones v Halton [1909] 2 KB 444; Browne v DC Thomson & Co [1912] SC 359; Irish People’s Assurance Society v City of Dublin Assurance Company Ltd [1929] IR 25 (SC); Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116, [1944] UKHL 1 (03 April 1944); Awolowo v Zik Enterprises… [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am by Scott Bomboy
A federal district court agreed with the plaintiffs and cited another Ninth Circuit case, Martin v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Jones     Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 09a0069n.06  USA v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:49 pm by Michael Stevens
Jones     Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati 09a0069n.06  USA v. [read post]