Search for: "Martinez v. Attorney General, United States" Results 81 - 100 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Office of the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 19-1031Issue: Whether federal law preempts the application of state and local labor laws to the terms and conditions of participation in the federal au pair program. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
Arguing for Illinois will be the state’s Solicitor General, Michael A. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Jill Family
Carlos Martinez Gutierrez arrived in the United States with his parents when he was five years old. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am by Chris Wesner
§ 1334 and Amended General Order 05-02 entered by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, referring all bankruptcy matters to this Court. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
[i]s a nonsectarian school in accordance with the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm by Rory Little
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 10:02 pm
Waxman, who served as Solicitor General, the United States' chief appellate attorney, from 1997-2001 and is now a D.C. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
It held that the  general rule in New York is that marital fault should not be considered in determining equitable distribution. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Hurles 14-191Issue: (1) Whether, under this Court's decision in Martinez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
 at ___ (Martinez, J., dissenting).In this Court, the Borrowers assert the same substantive arguments that they did in the court of appeals. [read post]