Search for: "Martinez v. US Bank" Results 81 - 100 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Lisa McElroy
National Australia Bank, the Court held that Australians could not sue in American courts over fraud by an American division of an Australian bank. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
Chase Manhattan Bank, 73 N.Y.2d 1, 10–12, 537 N.Y.S.2d 787, 534 N.E.2d 824). [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  The third's a little hard to research, so we'll use a proxy for the allowing of negligence concerns in strict liability, which is whether a plaintiff’s comparative fault/negligence reduces the verdict or at some level becomes a complete defense.Here's what we've found:AlabamaAlabama follows its own peculiar form of strict liability called the “Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
  Pending resolution of Elonis, the Court appears to be holding the case’s twice-relisted doppelganger, Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am by Erik J. Heels
v=RvV3nn_de2k Since 2001, LawLawLawTM has documented trends in technology, law (mostly patents and trademarks), baseball (mostly Red Sox), and music (mostly rock). [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am by John Elwood
  The Court also relisted, for a ninth time, Martinez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm by John Elwood
Serial time-wasters will recall that, before skipping town in June, the Justices gave us an unusual final OT2012 relist:  Octane Fitness v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Caulkett 13-1421, and Bank of America v. [read post]