Search for: "Marty v. Marty" Results 81 - 100 of 854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2014, 3:57 am
I basis for Congress’s action in the Jerusalem passport case, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
On this week’s Lawfare Podcast, Lawfare Founding Editor Jack Goldsmith and Marty Lederman—Georgetown law professor, Just Security blogger, and former Justice Department official—sat down to discuss the Supreme Court’s sweeping ruling in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 7:21 am
Marty's post below on detaining children and using them as bargaining levers illustrates an important difference between the logics of "necessity" and "self-defense. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
American Legion National Commander Marty Conatser has issued a strong statement criticizing the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision in Buono v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 2:06 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Marty Lederman’s post examining the possible implications of the decision is here. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 5:18 pm by Will Baude
As predicted, the United States has filed a cert petition and stay application in Trump v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
I'm just don't think that Missouri v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:25 pm by Staci Zaretsky
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 9th Circuit, California, Gay, Gay Marriage, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:29 pm by Rick Hills
Marty Lederman recently asked me in a comment to an earlier post on Gorsuch’s concurrence in Dimaya how I thought Gundy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:07 am
The latest issue of the Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (Vol. 73, no. 3, 2013) is out. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 12:48 pm
Marty Lederman responds:The reason John and his colleagues are so spooked by the prospect of judicial review is that they want the President to be able to act in accord with very radical and questionable legal interpretations, without any risk that anyone will ever call them on it. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:15 am by Bruce Ackerman
It is for this reason that Smith v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 10:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Flom, president and CEO, Manhattan Automobile Company Steven V. [read post]