Search for: "Matter of BM" Results 81 - 100 of 106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 4:40 pm
Brooklyn Probate Lawyers said the jury found that G, S, EV and the Estate of BM were not entitled to any compensation. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
 It therefore makes it possible for a patentee "to determine whether, if a particular drug were put on the market, it would infringe the relevant patent" (BMS v Royce (1995)). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:40 pm by Michael Grossman
That’s a violation of Otsuka and BMS’s obligation to the public to disclose a full list of specific adverse effects their products could cause. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:16 am by charonqc
“The following seven paragraphs have been redacted [It was reported that a new series of interviews was conducted by the United States authorities prior to 17 May 2001 as part of a new strategy designed by an expert interviewer. v)  It was reported that at some stage during that further interview process by the United States authorities, BM had been intentionally subjected to continuous sleep deprivation. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm by vforberger
On March 26th of this year, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that further review in Amazon Logistics v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:27 am by Ron Coleman
BM must have been pretty peeved, because they immediately filed papers accusing the clothing company of benefiting from its own luxury image and demanded they stop. . . . [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Jason Rantanen
(“BM” is representative of the business-method art units in technology center 3600, which includes art units 3621-29, 3681-89 and 3691-96.) [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
July 27, 2015) Interesting TM/copyright case that straddles the boundaries of so-called aesthetic and “utilitarian” functionality: is the accuracy of a replica product a matter of utilitarian or aesthetic functionality? [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am by MBettman
 After several continuances, the hearing for this matter was ultimately held on July 11, 2016. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:05 am by Susan Brenner
The Supreme Court began its analysis of both parties’ arguments by noting that New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 901(a) states that “[t]he requirement of authentication . . . as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
IPSC Breakout Session I: Copyright: Music & Remixes Assessing France’s Graduated Response Scheme Against Piracy & State Interventionism in the Marketplace for Copyrighted Content Nicholas Jondet Strong philosophical attachment to ©, and economic interests—Universal Music is French-owned. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:20 am by Kristian Soltes
San Francisco-based Affirm said in May adoption by Shopify’s merchant base has gained momentum in recent months, with the number of sellers signing on having climbed to 12,500 in a matter of weeks. [read post]