Search for: "Matter of Barry"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,871
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2023, 8:54 am
It is the latest appalling report on our declining educational system — a matter that should be treated as a national crisis of literally historic proportions. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am
From the States and Municipalities Canada – Council Approves Lobbyist Registry for Barrie Barrie Today – Bob Bruton | Published: 5/4/2023 The city council approved creating a lobbyist registry for Barrie. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am
The best my research could uncover were: Matter of Taines v Gene Barry One Hour Photo Process, Inc., where the court refused to grant the purchasing shareholders lenient payment terms based on their oppressive conduct (123 Misc 2d 529, 539 [Sup Ct, NY County 1983]); Matter of Elniski v Niagara Falls Coach Lines, Inc., which allowed installment payments (101 AD3d 1722, 1722 [4th Dept 2012]); and In re Rapid Recovery Enterprises, Inc., which encourages courts… [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
” On this aspect of the case, most commentators have focused on whether Trump intended to influence the 2016 presidential election by making or benefitting from election campaign contributions designed to stifle public knowledge of newsworthy subjects before the vote.Whether such a charge can be sustained as a matter of state law is not a debate on which this article takes a stance. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 12:51 am
In 1990, the respondent, Mrs B, was raped by an elder of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mark Sewell, after they had been out evangelising together. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:28 am
See, e.g., Barry Nicholas, An Introduction to Roman Law 65–67 (1975). [2]. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
But so long as readers do in some measure trust them (at least as to matters where the reader lacks an incentive to do further research), libel law takes that into account. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
The parties' submissions established that respondent's denial of petitioner's FOIL request based on the public safety exemption was not "affected by an error of law" (CPLR 7803[3]; see also Public Officers Law § 87[2][f]; Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
The parties' submissions established that respondent's denial of petitioner's FOIL request based on the public safety exemption was not "affected by an error of law" (CPLR 7803[3]; see also Public Officers Law § 87[2][f]; Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
Barry v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 4:54 am
Barry Goldwater’s 1964 presidential campaign got the ball rolling by needling the so-called “Eastern liberal press. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 2:15 pm
(Desirability is another matter...) [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
In other words, the law, "deprives Plaintiffs of their right to communicate freely on matters of public concern" without state coercion. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Governing Law New Hampshire has consistently favored broad and liberal pretrial discovery in order to facilitate the search for the truth.1 Thus, “parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action . . . . [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
Governing Law New Hampshire has consistently favored broad and liberal pretrial discovery in order to facilitate the search for the truth.1 Thus, “parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action . . . . [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:20 am
India, which has been reticent to criticize Russia, is trying to focus today’s G20 meeting on other global matters. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 7:49 am
It means “The matter speaks for itself. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
Barry, 438 U.S. 531, 541 (1978). [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
In other words, the law, "deprives Plaintiffs of their right to communicate freely on matters of public concern" without state coercion. [read post]
