Search for: "Matter of Bellinger"
Results 81 - 100
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 9:11 am
Then the cause is important enough that international law doesn’t matter. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:01 am
Meanwhile, as John Bellinger wrote last night, the Washington Post editorial board gave its enthusiastic nod of approval to the President’s use of drones in Yemen. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
[and] the choice between a hasty retreat and a patient drawdown will matter greatly. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:24 pm
[and] the choice between a hasty retreat and a patient drawdown will matter greatly.” [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Bellinger, III argues that “the Supreme Court should not interpret the Alien Tort Statute, which was enacted for a different purpose, to allow U.S. courts to sit in judgment over acts that take place in foreign countries, without a clear congressional mandate. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 3:08 pm
It is also what a legal system does when what matters to it is its “internal” legitimacy – its fidelity to its own hierarchy of authority and interpretation. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 8:29 am
Having some subject matter background, but lacking extensive knowledge of the war crimes trials, I learned a great deal from Shawcross’ trove. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 8:15 am
John Bellinger and Donald “Trey” Childress have more on the grant of cert. in Kiobel and Mohamad here and here. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:35 pm
So they have reasons not to push too hard — both for fear of us simply ignoring them altogether (in effect withdrawing the acceptance that their opinion matters to the legitimacy of the activity) and because they want at least “parts” of it.The best place to be, then, for both sides, is roughly in the middle that Bellinger stakes out. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:31 am
State practice still matters.) [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
Bellinger III (George W. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
The ATS roots the violation in international law, and the remedy in domestic tort law, and it will matter crucially where one holds that corporate liability would have to exist, if it exists at all. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:36 am
Bellinger III, who was the top State Department lawyer under President George W. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:36 am
" This is no small matter, since Mexico does not have the death penalty – and it is not the first time the issue of denying foreign nationals access to consular advice has come up in Texas. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:05 am
Finally (for now, I'm still catching up), former State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger and his former State Department colleague (and soon-to-be Vanderbilt Law professor) Vijay Padmanabhan have a new piece out in AJIL lamenting the ongoing gaps they describe in IHL as applied to non-international armed conflicts. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:28 pm
As a practical matter, though, a state must be responsible for preventing terrorists from using its territory as a base for launching attacks. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:50 pm
I think they’re wrong; it matters because legitimacy matters, and legitimacy is partly a matter of being willing to set the public baseline for debate, rather than letting others set it for you. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:22 pm
John Bellinger has said more to defend the administration on the legality of these operations, and far more persuasively, than anyone in the administration to date.It is past time for Harold Koh to put some legal order onto the administration’s international law chaos. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
”At risk of some snark, I also have to say that the incoming administration was afflicted with a not-negligible amount of hubris, intellectual and moral, particularly in the matter of Guantanamo. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:25 am
Lewis There has been a good deal of discussion both here between Kevin Heller and Cully Stimson and over at Lawfare by Jack Goldsmith, Gabor Rona and John Bellinger on the impact of the Administration's declaration on Additional Protocol I and it's possible effect on hearsay admissions in military commission hearings. [read post]
