Search for: "Matter of Brown v Simon" Results 81 - 100 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am by INFORRM
But to conflate either with the matter of libel reform is to seriously confuse the issues”. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Further delay in proposed ICO GDPR fine for Marriott”. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Other guests include the judge Peter Rook, Desmond Browne QC and Gill Phillips, the Guardian’s director of editorial legal services. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am by INFORRM
  Desmond Browne QC representing Mark Lewis submitted that the allegations complained of were plainly defamatory and serious allegations and that Police as a public authority could not rely upon qualified privilege following recent authority (see Clift v Slough BC [2010] EWCA Civ 1484). [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Inforrm had a post as did the Panopticon blog and the Mishcon de Reya Data Matters website . [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Robert Chesney
The resulting conversation dove deeply into key questions such as the relevance and fate of Smith v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:00 am by John Day
 As applied to witnesses, a ‘disinterested witness’ is one who has no right, claim, title, or legal stake in the claim or matter at issue. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Should appeal to Gordon Brown with his “British jobs for British workers” spiel. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 2:22 pm by familoo
The judge has yet to tweet a response but no doubt it will simply be a matter of time. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am by Rob Robinson
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]