Search for: "Matter of Burgess v Burgess" Results 81 - 100 of 122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
However, the doctrine of noscitur a sociis is inapplicable here, for §100(b) already explicitly defines "process," see Burgess v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:48 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Zubik v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm by familoo
Certainly not the consumers of legal services or the bar either for that matter. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 16 May 2023, there was a pre-trial review hearing in the case of Leeds and another v Burgess and others. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
Hourly billing v fixed-fees. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Zinke, … their important amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
In Politico, Burgess Everett reports that Sen. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In 1755 Washington mounted his first campaign for the Virginia House of Burgesses, the colonial legislature. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts On 9 May 2023, Nicklin J continued to hear the trial in the case of MBR Acres Ltd v Free MBR Beagles and Saini J continued to hear the trial in Packham CBE v Wightman and ors. [read post]