Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
But so long as we avoid 5-4 conservative-liberal splits, he is happy, no matter what the opinion says. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
But what if the Court grants cert anyway? [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
I do have several questions: What assurances do you have that the Attorney General will be able to act in the timeframe we established? [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
Why does it matter? [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
The Court denied cert.) [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 2:38 pm
Insurance Law Motion to Compel Arbitration Question of First Impression (First Circuit) Conflicts Between State Laws Regulating Insurance and Acts of Congress Preemption Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 U.S.T. 2517, 330 U.N.T.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
Share The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In 2019, when the Supreme Court granted cert in Emulex v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Legal Background: Copyright and Derivative Works Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including “pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works,” 17 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
See also In the Matter of Wayne Pearson, Bayside State Prison, Dept. of Corrections, 2023 WL 33118862023 WL 3311886 (N.J. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
The only question concerned on what grounds the Court would rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Watson, 22-412Issue: Whether any amendment to a law originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose, no matter how minor the amendment and no matter the historical context, cleanses the law of its racist origins for 14th Amendment purposes unless the party challenging the law can prove that the amendment itself was motivated by racial discrimination. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
I call these scientific Dred Scott cases, which illustrate that sometimes science has no criteria of validity that the law is bound to respect. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:59 am
Please contact the authors if you have any questions regarding the FCA and other government-contractor or healthcare-related enforcement or compliance concerns. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
The government opposed cert in Robinson when the split was then 2-1, saying that the then-sole outlier holding that the law allowed suit against the government had retreated from its position, suggesting the split might disappear on its own. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
As a practical matter, this is a much more important case than Rahimi (which itself is quite important). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
In 2019, when the Supreme Court took cert in Emulex v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 5:23 pm
Fundamentals always matter. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
Watson, 22-412Issue: Whether any amendment to a law originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose, no matter how minor the amendment and no matter the historical context, cleanses the law of its racist origins for 14th Amendment purposes unless the party challenging the law can prove that the amendment itself was motivated by racial discrimination. [read post]