Search for: "Matter of Costa v Costa"
Results 81 - 100
of 278
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2009, 5:09 am
In a matter of first impression, the Court addressed the impact the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:27 am
Contra Costa County (1998) 63 Cal. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 9:27 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:00 am
(Concerned Citizens of Costa Mesa v. 32nd District Agricultural Association (1986) 42 Cal.3d 929, 939.) [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 7:34 am
Bookout v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:31 am
The case is Father M v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
The judge reasoned that:“…the infringement of a trade mark is at stake, which by its nature implies some urgency, as ‘The life of a trade mark depends on the promptitude with which it is vindicated…’ (Kerr on Injunctions 363, quoted in Tullen Industries Ltd v A de Souza Costa (Pty) Ltd 1976 (4) SA 220 (W) 220B). [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:03 am
(IP Dragon) Apple and IKEA in China: is it just a matter of accepting the loss? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
American Banana Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Justice Costa M. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:39 am
At the August 25, 2009 Initial Status Conference, the Court was informed of Cintron v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:02 am
That was how National City Mortgage Company v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
Take, for example, Vanegas v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:15 am
Rejection of an applicant for employment or license because of his or her conviction of a crimeMatter of Acosta v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2009 NY Slip Op 03667, decided on May 7, 2009, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Acosta decision explains that where a prospective employer rejects an applicant for employment because of that individual's conviction of a crime, the employer must show that such conviction is relevant to the duties of the position or poses an unreasonable… [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
The Appeals Board further held in Costa that vocational expert costs may be reimbursable even though the applicant is unsuccessful in their claim, and this aspect of the en banc decision has been followed in other cases, including Diaz v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:00 pm
In Graunstadt v. [read post]
