Search for: "Matter of Crawford" Results 81 - 100 of 1,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2021, 6:48 am by Thalia Kruger
As argued by the late Professor James Crawford, “waiver of immunity from jurisdiction does not per se entail waiver of immunity from execution. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To defeat a defendant’s motion, the plaintiff has no burden of establishing its standing as a matter of law; rather, the motion will be defeated if the plaintiff’s submissions raise a question of fact as to its standing” (Deutsche Bank Trust Co. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Crawford (Pace University), Emily Gold Waldman (Pace University), Menstruation Matters: Making Law and Society Responsive to Human Needs, NYU Press (forthcoming 2022): As we embarked on writing this book in 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had just begun to... [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:07 am by INFORRM
The law has been criticised for alleged consolidating the Pakistani Government control over media outlets- a matter which has been explored by Foreign Policy. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Bridget Crawford
There is no subject-matter limitation for submissions, as long as the paper relates in some way to gender and the law. [read post]
22 May 2021, 9:13 am by Krzysztof Pacula
This Thursday the Court delivered its judgment, which answers the second as well as two other (first and third) questions of the referring court, pertaining to the jurisdiction in matters of insurance. [read post]
21 May 2021, 8:10 am by Paul Stern
Next week marks the one-year anniversary of the death of George Floyd, whose murder at the hands of a police officer led to national protests over policing in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:30 am by Brittany E. Grierson
Recently, in the District Court for the Southern District of California, Magistrate Judge Karen Crawford declined to impose adverse inference sanctions against the defendants, despite the defendants’ negligent destruction of relevant evidence. [read post]