Search for: "Matter of DB" Results 81 - 100 of 216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2017, 5:40 am by Heather Di Dio
If you sponsor an Ontario-registered DB pension plan, you should continue to follow Ontario’s review of its solvency funding framework. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm by Matt McCormick and FHH Law
Section 74.1201(g) of the rules has been changed so that, when the new rule goes into effect, an FM translator rebroadcasting an AM station must be located so that the 60 dBμ contour of the FM translator is contained within the greater of either (a) the 2 mV/m daytime contour of the AM station – no matter how far that contour falls from the transmitter site — or (b) a 25-mile radius centered at the AM station’s transmitter site – even if the… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:53 am by INFORRM
Despite the judgment making clear the injunction lasted just a few hours until the children could be told and that the cause of death is a matter solely for the police / coroner, various social media parents groups continue to insist it’s obvious she died by the family court, whether due to shock at the ruling or taking something in the toilet in anticipation of the outcome; and that the injunction was to cover up the bias, corruption and discrimination of the family courts… [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:09 pm by Matt McCormick and FHH Law
Apparently on February 23 the Commission will amend section 74.1201(g) of the rules so that an FM translator rebroadcasting an AM station must be located so that the 60 dBμ contour of the FM translator is contained within the greater of either (a) the 2 mV/m daytime contour of the AM station – no matter how far that contour falls from the transmitter site — or (b) a 25-mile radius centered at the AM station’s transmitter site – even if the… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
DB v Chief Constable of Police Service of Northern Ireland (NI), heard 15-16 November 2016. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by Steve Matthews
But obviously, no matter how well read you are, there will always be new voices as possible ‘adds’ to your bucket. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:59 am by Scott R. Flick
  The clarifications apply not just to broadcasters, but to cable, DBS, and satellite radio providers as well. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 12 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of In the matter of EV (a child) (Scotland) and In the matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland). [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 5:26 pm by Edward Smith
  School District Liability for Arbuckle Burn Victim I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento Burn Injury Lawyer. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
” But also said that “the failure to investigate remains a matter of deep regret to Surrey Police; primarily because it has added to the pain and anguish felt by the Dowler family”. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 9:28 am by Gregory B. Williams
Patent No. 8,927,298 (“the ‘298 patent”), includes the “inventive concept” of using DBS technology to monitor the health of rodent populations by analyzing blood for biomarkers of infectious disease. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:57 am
  They start with a knee jerk bias supporting incumbent stakeholders no matter how bad that favoritism hurts consumers. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:35 pm by Harry Cole
That first batch of folks will consist of (a) all cable systems with 1,000 or more subscribers (although some such systems do get a break of sorts, as discussed below); (b) DBS (i.e., satellite TV) providers; (c) SDARS (i.e., satellite radio) licensees; and (d) large market commercial radio stations with five or more full-time employees. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Or, is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination of whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Or, is the agency’s decision subject to a threshold determination of whether the modification of the project constitutes a “new project altogether,” as a matter of law (Save Our Neighborhood v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:34 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Unfortunately LaTorrehandled his matter pro se and didn’t do it well, and so, got the “canned” decision that circulated some years back out of the federal judicial center. [read post]