Search for: "Matter of Gomez v Gomez" Results 81 - 100 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
Code § 1028(a)(1), and false attestation in an immigration matter in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Code § 1028(a)(1), and false attestation in an immigration matter in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
It has, for the first time, made available the full written cases of the parties (something done as a matter of routine by the US and Canadian Supreme Courts). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
  Each republication gives rise to a claim for damages attributable to that republication.Truth as a DefenseIn matters involving private plaintiffs and matters of private concern, the defendant bears the burden to plead and prove the defense of truth. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 10:53 am by John Floyd
  Judge “Must Be” Disqualified if Actively Participated in the Case   As for the Eleventh District’s distinction between perfunctory acts and active participation in disqualification matters, the appeals court was aware, or should have been, that the Court of Criminal Appeals had only once found “perfunctory acts” and that was in the case of Gomez v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:04 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Gomez, for instance, the court decided 6-3 that an unaccepted settlement offer of the maximum statutory penalty does not moot a plaintiff’s. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am by Allyson Ho and Scott Schutte
Gomez limits the effectiveness of Rule 68 offers to dismantle classes, but confirms the Court’s application of general mootness doctrines to class actions.) [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:39 am by Jay
We published an article a few months ago that highlighted the efforts of California personal injury lawyers Max Halpern and John Michael Montevideo from Gomez Trial Attorneys. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:52 am by Joy Waltemath
On the merits, the appeals court agreed with the lower court that the plan allowed the employer to deny severance benefits on the ground that the employee failed to return company property (he deleted computer files) upon termination (Gomez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
  In Berezowsky v Rendon Ojeda, 2016 WL 3254054 (5th Cir.2016) Michelle Gomez Berezowsky filed a Hague Convention petition arguing that Rendon wrongfully removed PARB from his habitual residence (purportedly Mexico). [read post]