Search for: "Matter of Guilford"
Results 81 - 90
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 7:31 am
Taking up (1), the Court of Appeals noted that temporal order of the felony and the killing does not matter for a felony murder charge, as long as they are a continuous transaction. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:19 am
The matter finally reached trial in September of 2019, where defendant was not represented by counsel. [read post]
20 May 2021, 10:38 am
The Court therefore reversed the SBM order and remanded the matter for a hearing on the reasonableness of SBM. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
This post summarizes criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals published on January 18, 2022. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 am
This post summarizes published criminal opinions of the Court of Appeals decided on July 7, 2020. (1) Accessory after the fact and obstruction of justice are distinct offenses and evidence supported jury instructions on each; (2) Failure to instruct the jury on the defendant’s belief that the killing was justified by self-defense was not plain error State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:20 am
The defendant was convicted at trial of driving while impaired and habitual DWI in Guilford County. (1) In its discretion, the Court of Appeals granted the defendant’s petitions for writ of certiorari to review the criminal judgment and civil judgment for attorney fees. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
The court drew a contrast between Powell, explaining that in the current matter, defendant’s girlfriend failed a drug test screening and was found in possession of narcotics on her person and in her vehicle, activity that was directly related to violations of her probation, and it was these actions that led to the screening. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
In this Guilford County case, the defendant was on post-release supervision (PRS) for a previous felony. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
The defendant appealed to the North Carolina Supreme Court, who remanded the matter to the Court of Appeals for review. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
In this Guilford County case, defendant appealed her conviction for trafficking methamphetamine, arguing (1) plain error in admitting testimony from an expert without a sufficient foundation for reliability under Rule of Evidence 702, and (2) error in failing to intervene ex mero motu when the prosecutor made improper remarks during closing argument about her past convictions. [read post]
