Search for: "Matter of Jackson"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
And it is no surprise where these suits are filed: never in Houston, Dallas, Austin, New Orleans, or Jackson. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
Justice Jackson explained that this did not matter, as precedent prohibited speculating as to a jury’s motivations or reasoning even when there are “specific jury findings that provide a factual basis for such speculation,” concluding “[w]e simply cannot know why the jury in McElrath’s case acted as it did, and the Double Jeopardy Clause forbids us to guess. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
The extent to which this statute codifies the common law rule has been a matter of some debate. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:42 am
” Lewis Jackson reports for Reuters. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am
The trouble was Justice Jackson’s prior service on the D.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Thanks primarily to Jackson’s efforts, the amendment fairly quickly attracted more than forty co-sponsors in the House. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am
Norah did not win or place in the top 3, but that's not what truly matters, is it? [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Howell Jackson, the James S. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
Jackson, COA22-280, ___ N.C. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:34 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
As a practical matter, it makes very little sense for states to add the sorts of burdens on presidential candidates. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
As a practical matter, it makes very little sense for states to add the sorts of burdens on presidential candidates. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The future Solicitor General and Office of Legal Counsel should take note of the questioning from Justice Gorsuch and Justice Jackson during the Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am
” Not that it much matters now, but in fact that’s not a question the case raised. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:24 am
Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Indeed, some of the objections that went unaddressed were not merely seemingly obvious; they were articulated expressly in the concurrence in the judgment by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson (hereafter SKJ). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan, and Jackson, like Justice Barrett, thought that the reflection on what comes next was unnecessary. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:16 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the court’s decision to dismiss the case, indicating that she would have denied the group’s petition outright. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:45 am
Justice Jackson would have denied the petition because of her views about when lower court decisions should be vacated based on mootness. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
But, as Miles Jackson and I note in a forthcoming article, uncertainties remain as to the recognition of these measures in customary law. [read post]
