Search for: "Matter of Jessica P." Results 81 - 100 of 140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Spencer L. Reames
If you want to cheat, the answer can be found in a recent Nassau County Surrogate’s Court decision, Matter of Wilder (NYLJ, September 3, 2015, p.25, col.6). [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Spencer L. Reames
If you want to cheat, the answer can be found in a recent Nassau County Surrogate’s Court decision, Matter of Wilder (NYLJ, September 3, 2015, p.25, col.6). [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 8:16 am by WSLL
Young, Faculty Director, Jessica Y. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 am by WSLL
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Jessica Y. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
The judge sided with Moody's and S&P, who said they were not liable under the Securities Act of 1933 as either underwriters or sellers. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:56 am
The judge then went on to explain how the litigation arose:Ariel Chavan attests that in September 2006, [Cohen], then presenting by the name Jessica D. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jessica Silbey, IP and Constitutional Equality Progress Clause: one part of project comes from qualitative/empirical data, about what people working in creative industries think progress is. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lemley: disagree as practical matter. [read post]
” Current FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel has similarly testified that she wants to continue an approach that “expressly eschew[s] future use of prescriptive, industry-wide rate regulation. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
Musk has threatened to sue Media Matters, who reported the antisemitic content they found on X and have stated that they would defend any litigation. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
(Wealthy business corporations, after all, are hardly certain to always take the side of the Left; one can certainly imagine them using their power in the future against speakers who are anti-capitalist or for that matter just anti-Big-Tech.)[254] The laws target a particular harm, though we can debate how much of a harm it is: large social media corporations' use of their economic power to unduly influence political debate. [read post]