Search for: "Matter of Johnson v Department of Correctional Servs." Results 81 - 100 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 1:54 am by davidmginsberg
I am not trying to be “politically correct” but this Blog is read throughout the world, and I seek to avoid misunderstanding at the risk and cost of repetition and being non politically correct. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Therefore, our review is for the correction of errors at law. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 6:51 am by Benjamin Wittes
  Kilcullen was surely correct that a top-down strategy will fail in Afghanistan given the power of local forces hostile to the central government. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
In granting the injunction, she simply indicated that the Justice Department was likely, but not certain, to prevail on those points at a later trial in federal court. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Johnson signed into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, on Aug. 6 of that year. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Decl. of Dana Johnson (Docket # 22) (Johnson Decl.); Decl. of Craig McLaughlin (Docket # 24) (McLaughlin Decl.) [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
“When considering an equal protection challenge in criminal matters,individuals are ‘similarly situated’ only if they are charged with the samecrime or crimes. [read post]