Search for: "Matter of Jonathan R. v Michael R."
Results 81 - 100
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
But last week the Ninth Circuit decided a case that shows how tricky government consideration of race can be, and how lower court judges sometimes make missteps in this complex area.The case is Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
One possibility, suggested by Michael Greve, is that the court was concerned about a replay of Michigan v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
In the following guest post from John Reed Stark, President, John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, and David R. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we analyze the essential issues raised in Spokeo v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 2:34 pm
In King v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:23 pm
One of the cases establishing this principle is Printz v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 9:54 am
” (emphasis added)); Sean R. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
(And does it matter?) [read post]
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
A: Bill Graham, Warren v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
Justice Elena Kagan made the same point in her opinion last year in Michigan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:56 am
I have no comment on the matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Part One, in the space below, we offer some reactions to the doctrinal analyses presented in a recent essay by Verdict columnist Michael Dorf. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Thus, Dole’s clear statement requirement, which Michael Dorf argues supports the government’s position in King, do not apply. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
As a matter of doctrine, the NFIB decision is not on point. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
In New York v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:23 pm
(And does it matter?) [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
It is not so much a matter of “real lawyers have blogs,” but rather whether what people put online using the name are, in fact real blogs. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court and the New Challenge to the ACA As Professor Michael Dorf explained in his Verdict column yesterday, the Supreme Court has agreed to hear a new challenge to the ACA, King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:55 pm
Michaels __ NJ__ (2014)29 Supervising chemist can testify in rape case if they independently verified correctness of DNA results State v. [read post]
