Search for: "Matter of L. v P."
Results 81 - 100
of 2,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
Pix Credit here My Administration places the highest urgency on governing the development and use of AI safely and responsibly, and is therefore advancing a coordinated, Federal Government-wide approach to doing so. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
Lee J held that the although the publisher believed publication of the matter was in the public interest, the belief was not reasonable in the circumstances [384]. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:25 pm
L. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:28 am
Indeed, when a Supreme Court plurality in Barnes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Rhapsody Int’l, Inc., 75 F.4th 985 (9th Cir. 2023) and Moses v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 4:37 am
Rhapsody Int’l, Inc., 75 F.4th 985 (9th Cir. 2023) and Moses v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
Chimienti v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
L. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 5:53 am
"[L]exicographers and the authors of English style guides have long changed practices to reflect the evolution of the English lexicon. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Shipman & Elizabeth P. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 5:49 am
L. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
For example, in Alberta, definitions of family violence in the Family Law Act, SA 2003, c F-4.5, and Protection Against Family Violence Act, RSA 2000, c P-27, do not yet include emotional and financial abuse or coercive control (for discussion see e.g. here). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
L. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
L. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:00 am
He was disbarred and ordered to pay costs, and the matter was referred to the Attorney General for possible criminal prosecution. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:50 am
Satz, that is effectively the inverse of Bierig-Kiejdan v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Myers, Pedro L. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am
C. v VSI Int ‘l, Inc (95 NY2d 308 [2000]) andMignott v Kreidman (65 AD3d 972 [1st Dept 2009]) to argue that there is no duty to “anticipate that controlling law would be overturned. [read post]