Search for: "Matter of LR" Results 81 - 100 of 160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
 A single Judge of the Bombay High Court held (Faze Three Exports (2004 (2) Arb LR 163 (Bom)) – Para 8-10) that S.24 of the Act affords parties the right to be heard by the tribunal and natural justice requires it since arbitration is a judicial proceeding. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:25 am
 A single Judge of the Bombay High Court held (Faze Three Exports (2004 (2) Arb LR 163 (Bom)) – Para 8-10) that S.24 of the Act affords parties the right to be heard by the tribunal and natural justice requires it since arbitration is a judicial proceeding. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 In “Law and Practice of Commercial Arbitration in Englan” authored by Mustill & Boyd (1989), at p. 131, it is stated: “The arbitrator should carefully consider whether the subject matter of the counter-claim was one of the matters submitted to him at the time of appointment. [read blog]
8 Oct 2011, 8:53 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
 In “Law and Practice of Commercial Arbitration in Englan” authored by Mustill & Boyd (1989), at p. 131, it is stated: “The arbitrator should carefully consider whether the subject matter of the counter-claim was one of the matters submitted to him at the time of appointment. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:38 am by Brian Cordery
Added matter HTC’s assertion that the construction reached by Birss J had the effect of adding matter was also dismissed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
 This moggy, by contrast, has just published a rather polemical article in the Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, whose controversial thesis is that non-specialist superior courts can not in general be trusted with patent matters. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 The Culture Secretary [2011] 3 CMLR 98 at [102], (upheld on appeal [2012] Bus LR 1766 at [53]). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:13 pm by The Legal Blog
Seetharama (dead) by LRs & Ors. 2007(1) SCC 674 and Commercial Aviation and Travel Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
 The judge further held that Manor Grand Prix's defence that Marussia was estopped from asserting its right under the Community Trade Mark Regulation was not available as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 1:49 am
As regards the latter, prosecution was brought under the Obscene Publications Act 1959 (R v Penguin Books Ltd [1961] Crim LR 176). [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:01 am by CMS
However, a dispute arose as to whether fixed costs were payable under CPR 45 or whether this was a matter to which standard costs applied. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm by NL
Railway (1877-8) LR 3 CPD 168 applied, being liability regardless of fault. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:39 pm by NL
Railway (1877-8) LR 3 CPD 168 applied, being liability regardless of fault. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was not doubted by the Court but they did not consider it of much relevance to the matter at hand. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:22 am by Dave
The Deputy Judge then made findings of fact which effectively disposed of the matter: (1) the purported sale of the flat was genuine and there was no obligation on Dr Kilduff to allow Mr Ashby to remain in the property for the rest of his life. (2) Mr Ashby paid rent and this was shown by reference to his cheque book pay stubs, movement of money by standing order between bank accounts, income tax and CGT returns. (3) Mr Ashby's evidence to this court about his evidence in the… [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:22 am by Dave
The Deputy Judge then made findings of fact which effectively disposed of the matter: (1) the purported sale of the flat was genuine and there was no obligation on Dr Kilduff to allow Mr Ashby to remain in the property for the rest of his life. (2) Mr Ashby paid rent and this was shown by reference to his cheque book pay stubs, movement of money by standing order between bank accounts, income tax and CGT returns. (3) Mr Ashby's evidence to this court about his evidence in the… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was not doubted by the Court but they did not consider it of much relevance to the matter at hand. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:58 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
It is a matter of record that Niko has been a party to the PSC from the beginning. [read post]