Search for: "Matter of Law v Gray" Results 81 - 100 of 841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2010, 6:09 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Any number of cases held that mismanagement and potentially unlawful conduct at a public institution (a law enforcement agency in particular) touched upon a matter of public concern.In 2006, the Supreme Court held in Garcetti v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Breaking: This morning, Judge Paule of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Breaking: This morning, Judge Pauley of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part (but mostly denying) the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:09 am by Russell Cawyer
  Determining whether the line between lawful preparation to compete and unlawful competition begins is sometimes gray. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm by INFORRM
  It has already led to a 2009 libel action in which Sir Charles Gray awarded Mr Levi £50,000 damages against Mr Bates (Levi v Bates ([2009] EWHC 1495 (QB)). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm by paperstreet
Cir. 1998) (en banc) (concluding that claim construction is a pure issue of law). [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm by Graham Smith
While the court acknowledged that those were matters for argument, they were not decisive in Google’s favour where the court was concerned only with whether there was an arguable case of publication.One issue that is left uncertain when applying Byrne v Deane is whether it is relevant to consider if the defendant platform has knowledge of the words complained of and their illegality or potential illegality. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 4:23 pm by slemberg
The Court also cited a Fifth Circuit opinion involving a seemingly identical letter from the Kay Law Firm, and a finding that the letter fell into a gray area: There are some letters that, as a matter of law, are not deceptive based on the language and placement of a disclaimer. [read post]