Search for: "Matter of Linn"
Results 81 - 100
of 219
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2013, 3:54 pm
Judge Moore rightly suggested that a computer by itself is clearly a machine and subject-matter eligible. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Rule of law is turned into a sham when courts have the power to arbitrarily decide matters based upon their own bias. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:30 am
Judges Newman and Lourie, however, currently qualify to move to senior status or retire, and in a matter of a few years Judge Linn could elect senior status, or to retire, as well. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:59 pm
Judges O'Malley, Rader, and Linn opine with aplomb: [A] prior court decision in which a party has failed to prove a patent invalid does not bar the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) from subsequently reexamining that same patent. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
” The district court granted summary judgment of invalidity based on a finding that the patents claimed ineligible subject matter and Alice appealed. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:25 am
The Discordant En Banc Ruling in Akamai Technologies and McKesson Technologies Part II*In challenging the correctness of the per curiam majority ruling, Judge Linn’s dissenting opinion makes four points. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:01 am
Chris Linn: “We’ve always said we’d do the show for as long as it made sense. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:53 pm
Judge Linn's approach is to only reach Section 101 issues when subject matter ineligibility is "manifestly evident". [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:42 am
Cir. 2008), in granting motions for judgment as a matter of law and summary judgment of non-infringement. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:33 pm
"The majority opinion is rooted in its conception of what Congress ought to have done rather than what it did," Linn said. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 11:41 am
It is fair to place him on the "pro-patentee" side of the bench – especially based upon his notion of broad subject matter eligibility and a high bar for inequitable conduct findings. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Judge Linn authored the opinion for the majority, joined by Judge O’Malley. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:00 am
Cir. 7/9/2012), the three-judge panel of Judges Linn, Prost and O’Malley assessed the eligibility of claims directed to a method and for exchanging credit debit obligations. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 4:30 am
Whether the claimed subject matter lies in the reality of patent-eligible subject-matter or is more correctly located in the Wonderland of abstract ideas is an issue that has been debated on both sides of the Pond, and on which the Dodo or the King of Hearts in his judicial capacity would surely have had an opinion if it had been brought to their attention. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:46 pm
(The opinion was written by Judge Linn, who also authored this week's CLS Bank decision.)LINK to Dealertrack v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:51 am
The majority, Judges Linn and O’Malley, focused on perceived difficulties facing courts in determining which inventions are unpatentably abstract and which are patentably concrete. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:53 am
Writing for the majority of a divided panel, Judge Linn, joined by Judge O’Malley, emphasized the court’s consideration of the claims “as a whole. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Cir. 2012) Download 11-1301Panel: Linn (author), O'Malley, Prost (dissenting) Despite two recent opinions by the Supreme Court, the issue of patent eligible subject matter continues to sharply divide the Federal Circuit. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
CLS Bank (CAFC 2011-1301) precedential; Judges Linn (author), Prost (dissent) and O'Malley In a model of court cogency, the opinion cuts to the chase, so as to provide clear guidance. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:04 am
The Federal Circuit panel, per Judge Linn, noted that the line between patent eligible subject matter and abstract ideas is an elusive one. [read post]
