Search for: "Matter of Minor v Ward" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Court] or branch in this state having jurisdiction in matters relating to the affairs of decedents. (9) “Descendant” of an individual means all of his [or her] descendants of all generations, with the relationship of parent and child at each generation being determined by the definition of child and parent contained in this [code].(10) “Devise,” when used as a noun means a testamentary disposition of real or personal property and, when used as a verb,… [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/08/08-99035.pdf Bills v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
However, the matter is remanded for clarification of findings at sentencing with regards to whether defendants possessed the firearms in connection with possession of cocaine. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
§ 1973, against Ward Connerly, Jennifer Gratz, the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative committee (the "MCRI," collectively, the "MCRI Defendants"), and against various Michigan officials (the "State Defendants"). [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Lopez-DeLeon, No. 06-41553 A sentence for illegal reentry is affirmed where defendant's prior California conviction for sexual intercourse with a minor qualified as a "crime of violence" within section 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, as documents established that the victim in that matter was under the age of 14. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by J. Gordon Hylton
The Proposal 2 amendment was sponsored by a number of groups, including noted black anti-affirmative action activist Ward Connerly and the Michigan Civil Rights Initiative, whose executive director was Jennifer Gratz, the successful plaintiff in Gratz v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
” Lockhart’s petition asks “whether § 2252(b)(2)’s mandatory minimum sentence is triggered by a prior conviction … that did not ‘involv[e] a minor or ward. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm by INFORRM
The “Minority Thought” blog has a post entitled “Demonise the Muslims? [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am by Sasha Volokh
" In fact, all nine Justices agreed that the law was content-based, though a minority disagreed on whether that should necessarily trigger strict scrutiny. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"2 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 1:13 pm by Dave
 In answering the question whether Welwyn had reasonably applied its special urgency procedure (presumably to ward off the vampiric Vanhegan), Jay J held that this was not the exercise of a draconian power like HMO enforcement (Webb v Wandsworth LBC (1989) 21 HLR 325); it was simply an inconvenient minor procedural error to fail to convene a Cabinet meeting on 31 March 2010 “which scarcely impacted on the substance of the matter”. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
US, No. 06-5301 Dismissal of claim for the return of cash that was seized and forfeited in connection with plaintiff's arrest for violating currency reporting laws is affirmed as the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the claim is barred by sovereign immunity. . .U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 27, 2008 U.S. v. [read post]