Search for: "Matter of Nephew v Nephew" Results 81 - 100 of 332
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2018, 7:14 pm by Scott McKeown
The second, matter was reviewed by the Federal Circuit today in Arthrex, Inc., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The text message gave the assets to a couple of nephews named in the text who had not been very close to the deceased. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:40 am by SHG
Ignoring the hyperbole, recognition of bad caselaw, from Terry v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am by Brian Cordery
Nevertheless, having considered the chain of title and following Edwards Lifesciences v Cook Biotech [2009] EWHC 1340 (Pat), in which the court held that to make a valid claim for priority as successor in title it is necessary to be a successor in title at the time of filing the application, and KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), in which the court held that “successor in title” includes a person who was a recipient of the beneficial interest in… [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
Researching the answer In KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), Arnold J held that information that would be acquired by the skilled person as a matter of routine can, in addition to CGK, be taken into account in considering inventive step. [read post]
There was, to be sure, common law marriage in most states, and this could complicate matters. [read post]