Search for: "Matter of Nimmer" Results 81 - 100 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Markets are usually not efficient and power therefore matters. [read post]
26 May 2020, 7:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Nimmer says so, and it would be unfair to make the plaintiff prove a negative, since “[p]rotectability can’t practicably be demonstrated affirmatively but, rather, consists of the absence of the various species of unprotectability. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:47 pm by Gareth
A Matter for Congress First, the establishment of a mechanism for exploiting unclaimed books is a matter more suited for Congress than this Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am by Ron Coleman
 I’ve got far more computers, in the forms of desktops, laptops, tablets and smartphones, than I can possibly justify, no matter how far I spread them out from each other. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:44 am by Ron Coleman
 How you say it matters — isn’t that at least half the game when it comes to “bullying,” after all? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 11:30 am by Steve Baird
The symposium we are promoting in this poster actually is a laughing matter, never-mind the otherwise serious topics and tone or that it has been approved for continuing legal education credits, not comedic credits. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 7:24 pm by Ron Coleman
 How you say it matters — isn’t that at least half the game when it comes to “bullying,” after all? [read post]
24 May 2011, 12:09 am by Lara
  In its Response to Whitmill’s motion, Warner Bros. claims the tattoo is not subject to copyright protection (supported by a Declaration by (perhaps the world’s leading) copyright expert David Nimmer). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 9:45 am
 The court quoted Nimmer on Copyright for “the prevailing view [ ] that no works are excluded from copyright by reason of their content. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
Nimmer, Nimmer on Freedom of Speech § 4.03, at 4-14 (1984). [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Nimmer sees this as no-harm, no-foul because most applications are accepted. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Stein: court resolves by moving away from subject matter to originality. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 am by Bruce E. Boyden
Later courts struggled with it too, and did not help the matter by referring to both the similarity necessary to circumstantially prove actual copying and the similarity necessary to establish improper copying as “substantial similarity. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Harper & Row gets litigated as a First Amendment/free press case by Floyd Abrams; Court relies on Nimmer. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Copyright Office – Copyright Matters Lecture Series: Nimmer on Copyright, Celebrating 50 Years – Video Podcast http://t.co/T4nYKZooeo -> UK IP Office seeks EC copyright views – Advanced Television http://t.co/4iVAmECgNc -> Merck awarded blockbuster damages for Apotex’s patent infringement http://t.co/v858ffZxD5 -> Avoid copyright violations http://t.co/UJhrM3HEk4 -> NY judge Chin blasts refusal to review online TV ruling http://t.co/EYOeeE4kNU… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm by Eric
I'm sure a law clerk or two will get glazed eyes seeing the same basic arguments presented over and over again, no matter how elegantly those arguments are expressed. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:40 am by Chris Castle
  Indie artists (and majors for that matter) have for years assumed that no one could possibly be that rude to all of their customers and that somehow artists were being singled out for the cold shoulder from Google. [read post]
7 May 2015, 8:41 am by Eric Goldman
By guest blogger Tyler Ochoa On Tuesday, May 5, an eleven-judge en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit recently held that California’s Resale Royalty Statute, Civil Code § 986, could not Constitutionally be applied to sales of works of art that occurred outside of California, even if the seller resides in California, because doing so would violate the Dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]