Search for: "Matter of Read v Thompson" Results 81 - 100 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am by Michael Lowe
  Read, “Coronavirus Transforming Jails Across the Country,” written by Cary Aspinwall, Keri Blakinger, Abbie Vansickle, and Christie Thompson and published by the Marshall Project on March 21, 2020. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Illinois Supreme Court addressed this issue in its January 25, 2019 decision in the Rosenbach v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the October 1, October 11, October 18, November 1, November 8 and November 15 conferences) Thompson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
It all seemed so easy and  matter-of-fact in retrospect, as Rose recalls: When [the whole roasted hog] was done, I served it up. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
James Thompson (Qualcomm CTO) gave such long, fast, and practiced narratives on direct examination that Qualcomm's counsel had to tell the witnesses to slow down. [...] [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
If a person has made no specific provisions, it is unlikely that you will be granted access without some form of court order, even if you have a probate certificate (as our client, Rachel Thompson, recently discussed in the Times, read her story here.) [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thompson Hosp., Inc., 86 AD3d 913 [4th Dept 2011]; Florio v Kosimar, 79 AD3d 625 [1st Dept 2010]). [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am by Florian Mueller
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]